CHALLENGES OF THE MATCHING OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL

Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija
Serbia


Abstract

The paper deals with specific issues and problems of the matching of revenues and expenses that are present in the field of financial reporting on intangible assets - elements of intellectual capital. The circumstance that in the modern economy, i.e. "Knowledge economy" tangible assets are losing importance, and that the success of a companies is highly dependent on their ability to use and manage intangible assets that become the dominant determinant of value creation and competitive advantage, impose the need for consideration to be directed to this current reporting field. In this regard, in this paper we deal with the constraints of the modern financial reporting model, we point to the reasons for non-recognition of most elements of intellectual capital in the balance sheet, identifying and discussing three classes of intellectual capital, and, in relation to each of them, we elaborate the problems of the matching of revenues and expenses.

Keywords



Full Text


References


Babai, F., Niazy, R., Talebi, M. and Jamal, M. (2016). Intellectual Capital Measurement and Reporting. Bulletin de la Royale des Sciences de Liege, Vol. 85, 1063-1069.

Blaug, R. and Lekhi, R. (2009) Accounting for intangibles: Financial reporting and Value creation in the knowledge economy. London: The Work Foundation.

Bränström, D. and Giuliani, M. (2009). Intellectual Capital Valuation and IFRS 3: A New Disclosure Opportunity. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 (1), 21-29.

Cronje, C.J. and Moolman, S. (2013). Intellectual Capital: Measurement, Recognition and Reporting. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, Vol. 16(1), 34-47.

Dandeker, M.P. (2017). Valuation of Intangible Assets and Intellectual Property. SDP Annual Conference, September, 11-22.

European Commission. (2006). Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in SMEs. Report to the Commission of the High Level Expert Group on RICARDIS. Belgium: European Commission.

Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Ferrier, F. and Wells, R. (1999). There is no Accounting for Intellectual Capital in Australia: A review of annual reporting practices and the internal measurement of intangibles. OECD Symposium on Measuring and Reporting of Intellectual Capital, August. (7-123). Amsterdam: OECD.

IFRS (2018). Interpretation and Application of IFRS Standards, London: Wiley.

Inkinen, H. (2015). Review of empirical research intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital,Vol. 16 (3), 580-599.

Lew, B. and Sougiannis, T. (1996). Penetrating the Book-to-Market Black Box: The R&D effect. Journal of Bussiness Finance and Accounting, Vol.26 (3-4), 419-449.

Matos, F., Vairinhos, V., Selig, P.M. and Edvinsson, l. (2019). Intellectual Capital Management as a Driver of Sustainability. Switzerland: ICCA, Springer International Publishing.

Mizik, N. and Nissim, D. (2011). Accounting for Marketing Activities: Implications for Marketing Research and Practice. New York: Columbia Business School.

Moolman, S. (2011). Intellectual Capital: Measurement, Recognition and Reporting. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

Smalt, S.W. and McComb, M. (2016). Accounting for Internally Generated Intangible Assets. International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, june, Vol.4(1), 1-15.