SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHALLENGES IN RURAL AREAS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, Serbia
Serbia

Institute of Economics Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia
Serbia


Abstract

The aim of the paper is to show the elements of a strategic approach to the sustainable development of villages in the Republic of Serbia. The subject of the study is the consideration of demographic, social and natural factors that are important for the survival and development of rural areas in Serbia, focusing on the main challenges and possible directions of agro-economically sustainable development. Extreme heat waves are occurring more frequent due to natural fluctuations in global temperature and careless human behavior. These undesirable climate changes have a direct negative impact on the environment. We build on previous key findings and focus on strategic considerations for sustainable rural and agricultural development in times of severe climate change. Our two main arguments are that agricultural insurance in Serbia should follow the standards and trends of economically developed countries in the market economy in order to mitigate the risks of climate change. A growing number of insurance companies, a more active role of the government and educating farmers about the many advantages that insurance offers, but also different forms of insurance products can have a strong positive impact on the agricultural sector. The second argument refers to non-market and heterodox approaches that draw on critical agricultural studies and critical development studies by looking for other post-growth economic frameworks for the future.

Keywords



Full Text


References


Barbieri, L., Ahamed, S., & Bliss, S. (2019). Farming within limits. Interactions, 26(5), 70-73.

Bliss, S., & Egler, M. (2020). Ecological economics beyond markets. Ecological Economics, 178, 106806.

Brick, K., & Visser, M. (2015). Risk preferences, technology adoption and insurance uptake: A framed experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 383-396.

Berger, Z. D., Evans, N. G., Phelan, A. L., & Silverman, R. D. (2020). Covid-19: control measures must be equitable and inclusive. Bmj, 368.

Bliss, S. (2019). The case for studying non-market food systems. Sustainability, 11(11), 3224.

Borras Jr, S. M. (2020). Agrarian social movements: The absurdly difficult but not impossible agenda of defeating right‐wing populism and exploring a socialist future. Journal of Agrarian Change, 20(1), 3-36.

Carson, J., (2020) Innovation in Food Access Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic (No. 402), Perspectives Brief. The Carsey School of Public Policy

European Commission (2017a), “Risk management schemes in EU agriculture; dealing with risk and volatility”, available at:https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/markets-and-prices/market-briefs/pdf/12_en.pdf

Ghosh, P., Mookherjee, D. and Ray, D. (2000), “Credit rationing in developing countries: an overview of the theory”, in Mookherjee, D. and Ray, D. (Eds), A Reader in Development Economics, pp. 383-401

Gerber, Julien-François. (2020). “Degrowth and Critical Agrarian Studies.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (2): 235–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1695601

Holt-Giménez, E., ed. 2010. “Grassroots Voices: Linking Farmers’ Movements for Advocacy and Practice.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 203–236.

Iturrioz R. (2009): Agricultural Insurance, Example Series on Insurance, The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 1-20.

Ka Hung Chan, Kwok-Yung Yuen, COVID-19 epidemic: disentangling the re-emerging controversy about medical facemasks from an epidemiological perspective, (2020). International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 49, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages 1063–1066, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa044

Mihailović, B., Popović, V., & Radosavljević, K. (2023). Characteristics of land and climate indicators as the basis for agricultural production planning in the municipality of Vlasotince. Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), 5(2), 133-149, pg. 147.pg. 147

McGreevy, S.R., Rupprecht, C.D.D., Niles, D. et al. (2022). Sustainable agrifood systems for a post-growth world. Nat Sustain 5, 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00933-5

Milstein, C. (2020). Collective Care Is Our Best Weapon Against COVID-19. Mutual Aid Disaster Relief.

Martínez-Alier, J., L. Temper, D. Del Bene, and A. Scheidel. 2016. “Is There a Global Environmental Justice Movement?” Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (3): 731–755.

Radosavljevic, K., (2021). Аgricultural insurance as a means of financial protection of agribusiness in Serbia, Contemporary Challenges and Sustainability of the Insurance Industry, ISBN 978-86-403-1693-4, Faculty of Economics, Belgrade, pg. 207-228, COBISS.SR-ID 39558153, str. 208 citat

Radosavljevic, K. (2017), Marketing Channels of Agricultural Products, Institute of Economic Sciences, Belgrade pg. 178., ISBN 978-86-89465-36-5, COBISS.SR-ID 250955788, pg. 163

Roberts R. A. Ј. (2005): Insurance of crops in developing countries, (Vol. 159) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Steffen, W., J. Grinevald, P. Crutzen, and J. R. McNeill. 2011. “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 842–867.

Sredojević Z., Jeločnik M., Subić J. (2010): Insurance as Possibility of Business Risk Reducing in Agriculture, Scientific Papers Series Management „Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, Vol.10 (2), pp. 207-211.

Tešić, N., Kočović De Santo, Radosavljević, K. (2023). New insurance directions as a response for climate change. In: Challenges and insurance market’s responses to the economic crisis: [monograph of international significance] (str. 191–213). University of Belgrade, Faculty of economics and business, Publishing centre.

Tóth, J. and Nemes, A. (2014), “Market-type and government supported risk management in the Hungarian agriculture”, paper presented at EAAE 2014 Congress, Ljubljana, August 26-29, available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae14/182854.html (accessed August 12, 2016).

Turvey C.G. (2001): „ Wea1herderivafivesfor specific even1 risks in agriculture Review 0fAgricH1frtraI Economics, рр. 341

United Nations, (2020), The Suistanable Development Goals Report 2020, str.24-79.

Vujanović, V., Kočović De Santo, M. (2023). Coupling Culture and Space for the Post-Growth. Kultura polisa, 20(2), 175–197. https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1483/1409

Wąs, A. and Kobus, P. (2018), “Factors differentiating the level of crop insurance at Polish farms”, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 209-222.

Wang, M., Ye, T. and Shi, P. (2016), “Factors affecting farmers’ crop insurance participation in China”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 479-492, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12088

Zubor-Nemes, A., Fogarasi, J., Molnár, A., & Kemény, G. (2018). Farmers’ responses to the changes in Hungarian agricultural insurance system. Agricultural Finance Review, 78(2), 275–288. Doi:10.1108/afr-06-2017-0048

Internet sources:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:82:FIN REGULATION (EU) 2018/1999 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU)

https://www.pregovarackagrupa27.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Deklaracija-iz-Sofije-o-Zelenoj-agendi-za-Zapadni-Balkan-SRP.pdf

https://europa.rs/evropski-zeleni-dogovor-cilj-evropa-kao-prvi-klimatski-neutralan-kontinent-do-2050-godine/

https://atlas-klime.eko.gov.rs/lat/map

https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data